|
Agent Office versus Top Producer
Note that I am also a reseller for "Active
Agent for Outlook", 360Agent, Realty
Juggler, Real Estate Success Tools (soon),
All Clients, and
AOS.
Note also that I have no qualms about pointing
you to another link on my site that includes MANY different CRM (Customer
Relationship Management) tools which is
here. The point is that I will point you to whatever I think best
suits your particular needs.
Last updated - August 14th, 2006 - please
keep in mind that this was originally written in 2001. I've tried to
keep it up here and there, but I have not done what really needs to be
done, which is start from scratch and rewrite it. I will - one of
these days. :-)

My Opinion & summary:
I have spent a great deal of my time teaching Agent Office/Agent 2000/Online Agent
over the years, hereafter
referred to as AO, to groups and individuals. I have been following, and
playing with Top Producer since it's inception, hereafter referred to as TP. I started with a
similar Real Estate specific software product called Real Estate
Specialist (DOS) in 1990. I learned AO for a Coldwell Banker agent as
Online Agent, so I could automate his 140 transactions a year with it, in
1994. I know AO much better than TP, but have watched TP since it first
came out.
I was the regional
technology consultant for the Southeastern PA & Delaware RE/MAX region(1,800
agents & 100 offices) 1998 & 99. I constantly asked people which they preferred. I
found a fair number of users to be very vocal about one being better than
the other, usually TP users. But then, when I asked what it was they liked better about
theirs, than the other, it turned out they had not used the other program.
Which meant asking them which was better, was pointless and without merit! My criteria for a worthwhile
opinion became:
1) They must have used
both (not necessarily at the same time) in a production environment, for
at least 6 months
2) They must have used
all the modules comprehensively, with the exception of the
checking/financial (many people use Quicken instead) & MLS
modules.
I've long since stopped
asking, but after about 2 years, I found only 10 people that fit that
criteria (remember this was in 2001). All preferred Agent Office, in varying degrees. I have also worked
with a consultant that travels all over North America, automating agents,
as do I. He and his tech assistant both consider AO easier to learn and
use, to be more stable/consistent, and less buggy. You will also now
find comments by "qualified" individuals below this article. TP
6i (the offline version), and
RE/MAX Agent
2000/Online Agent/Agent Office/Executive Agent (they're all the same program
- just branded by different franchises), are very comparable with regards to the functions they
provide. TP has always been far more heavily marketed than any other program of
it's kind, since it came out, hence a higher market share. TP tends to
lead the pack in coming out with the newest features. They were always a
few bells and whistles ahead of AO. They were first to come out with Data
Synchronization (at least 5 years overdue in Real Estate specific
software), and Palm Pilot data synchronization. That being said, they usually
announced a new feature long before they deliver it, and then when they do,
it usually is problem prone for a while for many users. They also are more costly. The
same tends to be true of their version upgrades. I have personally
installed AO for dozens of agents, including the top producing RE/MAX agents
in this region with 8,000 contacts, that were TP users for years, but became
disenchanted by having to go through an upheaval in their business each
time a new version came out. AO tends to lag behind
on the features, and they don't upgrade as often, but they're more
conservative about announcing them, and when they come out, they work well
with few glitches.
That had been true up until Version 6.0 It
had a few bugs, more so than in the past, but they were resolved and made online
patches available, which solved the problems. Having been bought
first by Moore Data, then by Vista Information Solutions Inc., and now by
Fidelity National
Information Systems, it appears that
their philosophy is to continue to improve as they go, and make those
improvements available frequently. Each time they will probably want another $229.
There were 5 upgrades between about the beginning of
2005, and mid 2006. That is one heck of a lot of upgrades, and several
were pretty lame. That pattern looks to now be over. Let's just say
it was due to some corporate musical chairs with the product. It is now a
separate entity and profit center, and from what I've seen lately, Agent Office
is on the road to becoming much more of what it can be. For the
first time in a long time, my, and other opinions, have been sought with regards
to how it can be improved. This is a tremendous indicator that there is a
better attitude there than there has been for a while.
Upgrades - if you skip one, and wait until the next
one, it will still PROBABLY be $229. Their thrust at this point is that you can
upgrade from any version whenever you want, for $229. If you have an older
version, say 4.5 or older, the upgrade to Version 9.0 would include the changes
included in Version 5.0, which follow immediately below, and then also all the
changes in the subsequent versions.
As new versions come out, I will post their details
here.
NOTE: Top Producer 6i (the offline version) is no
longer available as of May 22nd, 2006. Support will not continue for
very long. There was more on the comparison below, but it is no longer
relevant. You can still view it here if you
like.
Up till now, we have been discussing the offline
version of TP - 6i.
Now I have to speak
to Top Producer's 7i - the online
version. The primary difference is that 7i is available online, and
can interact with a Web site.
The downside to that was that it could not be used
offline. That has been resolved, as you can now maintain a database
offline as well (for an additional monthly fee). I do NOT know how well this works yet. This opens up some tremendous opportunities. For one - the
ability to have someone fill in a form on a Web site, then that data
automatically downloads into your TP database.
Something close can be done in AO. If your Web
designer will set up your site to send you an e-mail when someone fills
out a form on your page, in a ".vcf" format (a vCard), then AO can create a new
contact by using the data in the vCard to populate a new contact.
I recently re-examined
being a reseller for TP 7i because it is online, and I wanted to be able
to offer people that solution. I decided not to yet,
because I was getting too much negative feedback about it being; sometimes
slow; and while upgrades are free, it seems that
when they make a change, the user is back into a learning curve too often,
or as has always been the case with TP, they're glitchy.
I also continue to hear that it is too hard to learn.
Until recently, I only had
hearsay about a very bothersome
idiosyncrasy. That being that you can only open one module at a time.
Now - working with a client to set up his operation, I used TP to do it.
The hearsay is now my personal opinion. The inability to work in only one window
at a time is extremely cumbersome.
Another nagging issue is that you must commit to an
ANNUAL contract.
That said, while investigating becoming a reseller,
I was told by TP that I could not be one, because I was too involved in Agent
Office! I told TP that I wanted to promote whatever was best for my
clients. I wanted to promote Agent Office as the best OFFLINE solution,
and TP 7i as the best ONLINE solution. They will not allow it. They
will only let me resell TP if I promote BOTH of their solutions as the best. As I
will not mislead my clients and readers, I would not agree to it.
NOTE: There IS an online solution for OLA/AO.
It can be a little more pricy than TP IF you have multiple users, but the clients I have using it, love it. It will
synch with your Palm, and you can also synch it with your laptop, so you have
your database with you offline. You can then make changes to your laptop,
and then re-synch it with the online database. With it, you also have use
of MS Outlook in conjunction with AO for e-mail purposes -
for more
information...
In summary - finally
the summary - I have always believed AO to be
superior to TP offline, BUT, I have never tried to sway anyone FROM one TO the
other...until I found out that they were not going to continue to improve
6i. That said, they both have their glaring deficiencies. They'll both
disappoint you at times. They'll both make you more money, save you time, and reduce your
daily stress immeasurably. If you're already using one, the best one
is the one you use! If you're looking to start with an offline
solution, AO is a no-brainer, as 6i is now a white elephant. Online - it's
a toss up. Call me if you want my current leanings, at 215.345.5222.

Now here are some
candid opinions from different users of TP, ACT, and AO, except for the
most recent ones, most of whom have used
both:
First comment - "I think AO (at FNIS)
people are listening to this discussion group and learning from us. They are
making the product better. In a poll at
http://www.RealtyChat.com - AO has a
400% dominance over Top Producer."
Reply - "I think that AO appeals to computer users. It is
rock solid and somewhat intuitive. You can understand what is going on and mold
it to your own way. Top Producer is a whiz bang - what happened? - kind of
software and the user has little control over it or their own data. Since the
former kind of user would be the one spending time on e-lists like this one, I'm
not surprised at the dominance."
Posts from a
Yahoo Users Group for Agent Office - Feb 27, 2006
We are users of both and there are
significant difference between these two applications - if you use their
advanced features. Plus migrating between them (we just went from TP to AO) is
less than ideal (the technical terms is sucks!)
If you are starting from scratch - don't
currently use either. Then AO is probably best - simpler learning curve. Plus
TP7i is only online (internet based) and might not be what you want to do with
your database...
Ed Rocha
Have been using it for almost 7 years now. Great
program. I now have it
hosted remotely at eServerAgent - I can access it on any computer in my
office network as well as on any other computer elsewhere if I just download
a little program.
IGGY Dybal - RE/MAX Best - Kansas
City
I completely agree with Marge. I have been using
Agent Office for months
and I absolutely love it. I am able to do everything calendar wise and
contact wise with one piece of multi-faceted software. It writes letters,
keeps up with contacts and things-to-do. Syncing with my Palm has never
been easier!
Amber Erickson,
REALTOR
Keller Williams Realty Emerald Coast
In response to Jennifer's question. I use Agent
Office and hot sync it to my
Palm with no problems. Very useful and fairly easy to use.
Marge Bennett,
Realtor, e-PRO, WCR
VIP Realty Group Inc.
I am very happy with
my online agent software. It does what I need and probably more. I bought it
through Gary Hall and that was the best decision ever. He's been great, even
though he doesn't need to help me, he has been very kind in getting me out of
trouble if I get into it. Thanks, Gary, if you see this.
Jane Becker, CBR,
MCBA, GRI
Home Team AdvantEdge Co.
After trying Top
Producer 7i, I selected Agent Office and like it much better. I just purchased
the 6.0 upgrade, plus the training DVD's for my new assistant, since I had not
been utilizing the follow-up systems to the fullest.
I like the idea that it's on our hard drive and not on-line. (My office's DSL
line seems to go down often, and then we were out of luck). My assistant updates from
her office computer, and then I can sync to my home office pc through a network,
so it's just like having an on-line service . . . only it's never "down".
The new version of Outlook is supposed to be a good database management system.
I understand that you need to purchase some add-ons to make it work like AO, but
I'm not changing, . . . as the Three Amigo's say "The best system is the one
that you USE, and the one that works for YOU", and I like that!
Dianne Dunn, Coldwell Banker
Willis-Smith
Real Talk Post - 4/14/2004
"To anyone
wondering about software choices, perhaps this may help...Gary's
Experience and Advice is right on the Money with my Experience, which is:
1- ACT:
Worked with it for 5 years in corporate environment, taught it to others,
and used it 2 years in RE including the RE add on (junk) and customized
for RE use.
2-
Goldmine: some experience in corporate use
3-
Outlook: I use it today extensively based on
David Allens "Getting Things
Done" system, which is
taught to very busy corporate big wigs across the country, and I teach how
to use Outlook as an E-mail and Task manager to other agents.
4- Top
Producer 6i: Played with it for a few months till my stomach got upset.
Before choosing for RE, I even looked deep and hard at very powerful hi
tech Customer Relationship Management systems big companies like IBM use,
like Salesforce, Sales
Net, Upshot, and Microsoft's CRM. And of course a bunch of Outlook add-ons, remember I am a huge Outlook fan.
Finally,
with the above experience, and after mucho research, especially after
speaking to highly knowledgeable people in the field (thanks Bob Corcoran
among others) I chose Agent Office, hosted online for multi users, for our
Real Estate business. The whys
and why nots of all this have been rehashed again and again, for me, in a
quick nutshell:- It's
easy and fun to use- It works
for REAL ESTATE, especially the action plans- It is
easy and cheap to get top notch one-on-one training with Gary Hall, to get
up to speed real fast- It's fun
to watch Jim Caseys DVD series and learn as you watch. The more
you play with it, the more you love it, even for a beginner. I love it.
A tad clunky, but that actually endears me to it even more. All I can
share is, with the experience above (and I'm sure some here have much
more), I learned Agent Office was and is the best for me and my team. You
can learn the hard way too, or learn from others who have gone down the
path of hard knocks, and emulate them instead.
Consideration to learning and using a proper database system probably
should only apply to someone serious about the business and who wants to
do volume, or streamline their tasks and follow up systems with the volume
they have. If I were selling less than a dozen homes a year, I would not
even bother with all this, a shoebox, a pad of paper, a pen, Word, some
postcards and some stamps would work fine. We have a
choice, re-hash a bunch of pros and cons, or emulate the most successful.
Based on my research, more high volume agents and teams choose to use AO
than any other program. Some of
the top trainers and coaches to stars recommend AO, Proctor, Corcoran
etc...With
hindsight, I have a good laugh at myself thinking of the energy and time
wasted trying to use Outlook, Act etc for RE...now that I know how well
and easy AO is to use. A well
managed client Database is golden. Mail to them properly and regularly
and you are guaranteed a solid referral business forever. Spend
$600-$700, get the software,
Jim Caseys DVD's and a few hours of
Gary
Hall's training. Better
than sliced bread. Hope this
helps someone choose instead of ponder. I already did. "Just my 2 bits".
Tony
Schimek - Prudential
Carolina Real Estate Charleston
SC
Real Talk Post - 2/18/2004
I used TP from the time it was a dos version
up through System 6. I found TP much easier to navigate and it seemed more
logical to me. I also found TP to be a better program in concept both in
what it was designed to do and how you could make it do things it wasn't
designed to do. That said, I switched to AO at the RE/MAX
convention a couple of years ago when I was going to have to pay TP yet
another $150 to upgrade the Top Connector module to conform to our new MLS
vendor. AO offered a discount to $199 for the entire program. It took me
nearly a year to bring myself up to speed, re create all of my mailing
plans and be comfortable with how it works. The biggest differences for me between the
two programs are:
1) AO is a MUCH more stable platform and has
not crashed on my computer once, whereas TP used to crash or lock my
computer on a regular basis.
2) My data files in TP got corrupted
regularly and this has never happened in OA.
3) OA is less expensive to maintain
4) Tech support is better with OA although
it has been declining a bit as they train newer tech reps. I hope this
will diminish over time.
5) TP does have more features than OA and I
do miss some of them
6) Searches and such are accomplished much
quicker in OA than in TP.
11/11/2003 - Kent Clark, submitted after reading this page.
I
purchased AO from Gary's company and was not only very pleased at the
service, but am very-very pleased with AO. For what it's worth to anyone contemplating software
choice: I have extensively used ACT (customized for RE), Goldmine,
Maximiser, Outlook (I teach the E-mail and Task pad segments of it to
Agents) and TP 6i. Uh, and Schedule plus and the old rolodex. If I had
been selling real estate for more than 6 years. I probably would know
Howard and Friends pretty well too:):) After much trial and error,
and research (learn from others instead of reinventing the wheel) I have
settled on AO, am learning it, and love it.
Real Talk Post - 6/21/2003
I have
used both TP and Agent Office (new name for Online Agent). Hands
down, I prefer Agent Office. TP I found to be difficult to use, full of bugs,
and long waits at tech support with little help in the end. Agent
Office, on the other hand, has been very reliable, few if any bugs, and, the
very few times that I have needed to contact tech support, I have waited a
short amount of time and had my problem solved. Hope this helps.
Real Talk
Post - 6/19/2003
Eric, We have used Online agent for several years as a team. From each
others desk tops and (from gotomyPC.com when we are mobile) we can access
each
other's schedules as well as our own. They sync well with our Palm 505's
and
hold lots of information that is convenient to have mobile. They have
training video's that were helpful and provide outstanding support.
Combined
with a fair price and regular upgrades I would recommend them to anyone.
Real Talk Post - 3/10/2003
Over the years we were constantly in a turmoil about
Top Producer, but having to relearn a new system, and not finding a better
system upon trying kept us tied to Top Producer. (In addition to the time
it would take to transfer all of the information that would not transfer
automatically). We didn't like the constant costs involved with updating
to the latest versions of Top Producer. We didn't like the idea of our
database being online with the new 7i, due to reasons mentioned by other RealTalk users, like downtime, ours or theirs, access to info if not online,
etc. We didn't like waiting what seemed like hours for tech support and
then the information that they gave us to fix the problems many times did
not solve it, which resulted in more phone calls, more wait time. The
basic program was good. The straw that broke the camels back was the
fact that we network our version of Top Producer with myself, my partner,
Rich and our assistant, Marcus. With three of us on the same system,
synching was a pain, but networking was almost worse. Whoever had the
master had to continually (and I mean 5-10 times a day) shut down their
system and reboot. This was not only a major source of problems for the
person who was the master, but also got to be a problem with the other
users. (Believe me, you don't want to be continually asking someone to
reboot just so you can look
up a telephone number.) We tried tech support many, many times for help
with this problem, but it could never be solved. We decided this was no
way to run a business and looked at other options. We had previously tried
other systems but none worked as well as TP at that time. Some users
said that they liked AO so we decided to give it a try. It has been
relatively easy to use. It was a reasonable price. Rich did have to call
support to help with setting up the Network portion, but they were quick,
friendly, helpful and efficient. I know that we don't have it to
perfection yet and I am going to try to learn more about the program over
time, but at the moment Agent Office is far and above the better program
for us. We do most of our business through email and just the ability to
do a lookup using an email address is 100 times easier on AO than it was
on TP. I like the email import into our AO contact records, and although
it doesn't have my signature yet, we use the work around that someone else
mentioned about setting up a template and using that. I have found that it
doesn't seem to have everything where I think it should be, but that could
be just a learning curve. BY THE
WAY, none of us have had to reboot because of a problem with OnLine
Agent!!!!! This in and of itself was worth changing to a new system. We
are very very satisfied with it. Hope this helped.
RealTalk Post -
1/10/03
We started using Online Agent a couple of months ago.
We had used TP for 7 or 8 years and had tried almost everything else on
the market. We love Online Agent and would recommend it for anyone.
I have not read the manual yet, although I have looked up a couple of
items in it when I wanted to do something that I couldn't figure out. I
have found it easy to use without a lot of work.
Real Talk
Post - 1/9/03
I made the
switch from TP to OLA. Never looked back. It's cheaper, cleaner,
easier and much more user friendly.
Real Talk
Post - 12/20/02
I moved from TP to Online Agent
(RE/MAX Agent 2000) in June and it was the best decision I've made recently. I,
too, had a lot invested in TP as I had bought all the add-on modules
and upgrades but I could see the writing on the wall - they were putting
their resources into their online version so the problems I encountered would
only continue. And no way, no how, will I ever put my data on their
servers as long as they're owned by Homestore. (Besides, from what I hear,
their servers aren't too reliable). LOVE OA! Bringing my data over
was such a breeze and so fast that I thought it hadn't done it completely
till I checked. Everything is simple to use and it just works which frees me up
to do what I should be doing. My only gripe with OA is that my
MLS still doesn't have a compatible product so I can download MLS data for
CMA's. Not a big deal on regular listing presentations as we do them
manually in Power Point but sure would like some automation for market updates
and such. Much better product, easier to
use, and no Homestore!
Real Talk Post - 10/31/02
I just dumped TP6i and Act 2000
to use Online Agent. I've used TP for years and have lots of money invested.
Online Agent is more stable, less learning curve and does everything I
need. I believe it is the generic version of RE/MAX Agent 2000.
Real Talk Post - 10/29/02
We went through a very lengthy discussion on
contact systems several months back. As a result of that discussion I had checked
out several systems. As a long time TP user (also with TP6i) I tested several
and looked at Wandering Star as well. There are actually several
other systems available. The advice on RealTalk back then was
overwhelmingly in favor of On-Line Agent (OLA) so I purchased it and really have
been pleased. It is a complete system and is easy to use. Sad to say but it
beats heck out of my costly TP6i. Thanks to the RealTalkers that
recommended OLA."
Real Talk post - 10/08/02

Contact us - 215.345.5222
HOME -
SITE MAP -
ABOUT US - SUCCESS
STORIES - AGENT
OFFICE SOFTWARE - AGENT OFFICE
SUCCESS STORIES - AGENT
OFFICE ACTIVITY PLANS -
TRANS-PLANS -
AGENT OFFICE TIPS - OUR SERVICES -
REAL ESTATE CONTACT
MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE -
RE-ACTION NEWS -
AGENT TOOLS -
AGENT OFFICE ONLINE
TRAINING -
TOP
PRODUCER SOFTWARE - AGENT
OFFICE INTERACTIVE ONLINE CLASSES -
ONLINE TRAINING & TECH
SUPPORT - REAL
ESTATE TECHNOLOGY SEMINARS -
CUSTOM FORMS -
MY BLOG
Created and Maintained by Gary David Hall -
Copyright 2000-2006 RE-ACT
|